How we help
The Cyber Resilience Act work we do, and what we leave out
Six things to buy, from a free check to monitoring you own. Fixed prices, a named engineer, and the one we are not selling yet.
Updated 27 September 2026
Pick the one that matches where you are
We help ordinary manufacturers get ready for the Cyber Resilience Act. We propose the changes to how the product is built, your own engineers merge them, and we write the paperwork that falls out of them.
Every package has a fixed price, a named thing you receive at the end, and an engineer whose name is on it. You remain the manufacturer throughout: we do the engineering and the drafting, you take the decisions and sign what carries your name.
Almost all of it happens in writing, in a shared tracker, at the times that suit you. Write to us and we answer within one working day; no part of the work waits for a call.
- Check whether the law covers youAutomated scope checkFree
- Know where you standScoping and classification memo€900
- Get ready to report nowReporting Ready€3,500
- See every gap, in orderEngineer-led gap review€4,900
- Set up your own monitoringMonitoring set-up, in your own account€1,500
- Train your teamHalf-day training, in-house, up to 8 people€1,500
Check whether the law covers you
Automated scope check
Free
Two minutes on this site, an answer straight away, and nothing to sign.
You answer a short set of questions about your product and get back a plain reading: whether the law reaches it, which group it falls into, which dates apply to you and what to do first. It runs on published rules rather than on a model, so the same answers always produce the same result, and the reasoning is shown next to the answer.
Nobody calls you afterwards unless you ask. If the rules do not reach your product, they say so, and you have spent two minutes.
Know where you stand
Scoping and classification memo
€900per unit
The same question answered properly, in writing, with an engineer's name on it.
You fill in one form in your own time and give us read access to your product documentation. You get back a signed scoping memorandum: whether the law covers each product and version and why, which group it falls into and who has to check your work as a result, the dates that apply to you, how long you should support the product, and the three things to do first. The manufacturer determines the support period so that it reflects the expected time in use; it must be at least five years unless the product is expected to be used for a shorter time.[Art. 13(8), third subparagraph]
If your product falls into one of the stricter groups, we say so and explain what that means for you. Conformity assessment uses the modules in Annex VIII. A default product may use internal control (module A), or, if the manufacturer prefers, EU-type examination with production control (modules B and C), full quality assurance (module H), or a European cybersecurity certification scheme where one is available and applicable. An important class I product must go to a notified body under modules B and C or under module H whenever the manufacturer has not applied, or has applied only in part, harmonised standards, common specifications or a European cybersecurity certification scheme at assurance level at least substantial — and also where no such standard, specification or scheme exists at all. An important class II product must use modules B and C, module H, or such a certification scheme; there is no internal-control route for it.[Art. 32(1), 32(2), 32(3); Annex VIII] For the shortest list of all, a formal European certificate applies only where the EU has singled the product out; otherwise it is the same outside body as class II. A critical product listed in Annex IV needs a European cybersecurity certificate at assurance level at least substantial, and then only where the Commission has adopted a delegated act saying so for that category, and it can only do that where a certification scheme covering the category has already been adopted and is available to manufacturers; any such act must normally allow at least six months to change over, and may allow less only where urgency justifies it. Where no such delegated act has been adopted, the product follows the class II route instead. We have not established which delegated acts exist today.[Art. 8(1); Art. 32(4)] The chapter that lets the independent bodies exist applies before the main duties do, and the European Commission lists the bodies notified for this law in its NANDO database. The chapter on the notification of conformity assessment bodies applies from 11 June 2026, so that notified bodies can be in place before the main obligations apply.[Art. 71(2); Chapter IV] If you are going to need one, it is much better to know that now than in the last quarter before the deadline.
The fee comes off in full against the three steps up from it — Reporting Ready, the engineer-led gap review and Market Ready — and that credit does not expire. It is the one line on our list with more than one thing to spend it against; everything else is credited against Market Ready. That is Article 9.7 of the agreement, not a sentence on this page.
Get ready to report now
Reporting Ready
€3,500per unit
This is the package for the reporting duty, which is already running, and it leaves you able to meet it. Manufacturers' reporting obligations for actively exploited vulnerabilities and severe incidents apply from 11 September 2026.[Art. 71(2); Art. 14]
The first thing you receive is code, not a document. We open one change
against your own code that adds four things: a build step that produces
a signed list of every component in the product, a check that stops the
build when a dangerous component gets in, the small standard file
(security.txt) that tells outside researchers where to send a security
report, and a note saying how long the product is supported. Your
engineers review and merge it. That merged change is the first piece of
evidence in your paperwork.
The rest of it delivers:
- a published policy telling outsiders how to report a problem to you, and the person who answers; Manufacturers must put in place and enforce a coordinated vulnerability disclosure policy.[Annex I, Part II, point 5]
- a written plan for what happens when one arrives, keyed to the legal clocks and practised once with your team; The first two filings are due without undue delay and in any event within the outer deadline — the hour figures are backstops, not an allowance to wait. For an actively exploited vulnerability: an early warning without undue delay and in any event within 24 hours of becoming aware, a vulnerability notification without undue delay and in any event within 72 hours, and a final report no later than 14 days after a corrective or mitigating measure is available.[Art. 14(2)] the plan covers the second path too, a serious incident affecting the product's security, which does not have to be an attack and which has its own test and its own last deadline; An incident that has an impact on the security of the product counts as severe, and so has to be reported, if either of two things is true: it harms, or is capable of harming, the product's ability to protect the availability, authenticity, integrity or confidentiality of sensitive or important data or functions; or it has led, or is capable of leading, to malicious code being introduced or run in the product or in a user's own systems. Either limb on its own is enough, and "capable of" is enough — the duty does not wait for harm that has already happened. This test is for severe incidents only; it never applies to the vulnerability side.[Art. 14(5)] For a severe incident the first two filings carry the same two-part standard: an early warning without undue delay and in any event within 24 hours of becoming aware, and an incident notification without undue delay and in any event within 72 hours. The final report is due within one month after the incident notification is submitted — the month runs from the filing, not from the 72-hour deadline.[Art. 14(4)]
- the message to your own customers, drafted next to the ones for the authorities, because telling the people the product affects is part of the same duty and not a public-relations afterthought; After becoming aware of an actively exploited vulnerability or a severe incident, the manufacturer must tell the users it affects — and where appropriate all users — about it, and where needed about the steps they can take to limit the damage, in a machine-readable form where that is appropriate. There is no fixed deadline: the standard is that it is done in a timely manner, and if the manufacturer does not, the CSIRT may tell users itself.[Art. 14(8)]
- a written record of who inside your company would act on a warning about the product, and how they are reached.
We work with Python, Node, Java, .NET and Docker, on GitHub Actions and GitLab CI, on one product family in one repository. Anything else we quote separately rather than guess at.
"Ready to report in ten working days" is the target for the core of that list, and the ten days are ours: they do not stop while we wait for a meeting, because there are no meetings in them. We track it day by day and you see the tracker. The dates go into your statement of work, and the contract commits us to reasonable skill and care in meeting them — not to a guaranteed result.
Choosing and configuring the tool that watches your components is a separate job with its own price — see set up your own monitoring below.
See every gap, in order
Engineer-led gap review
€4,900per unit
For a firm with more than one product, a bigger team, or somebody internal who already owns security and wants the evidence before the work.
We take a read-only copy of your code, run our scanners over it and compare what we find against the law's requirements, one by one. Products must be designed, developed and produced to meet the product cybersecurity requirements in Annex I Part I, and manufacturers must meet the vulnerability handling requirements in Annex I Part II.[Art. 13(1), 13(8); Annex I] You get a plain report of what is missing, with the evidence from your own code beside each item, and a plan in priority order that separates what you need now from what you need before the second date. The raw findings and the component list come with it, so your team can start without us.
Everything you pay for it comes off Market Ready in full, and that credit does not expire — see the package we are not selling yet below for where that leaves you. If you are a smaller firm with one product you do not need this anyway: the package above already tells you where the gaps are.
Set up your own monitoring
Monitoring set-up, in your own account
€1,500per unit
New weaknesses turn up in other people's code every week and some of them will be in yours, so somebody has to keep looking. Under this law that somebody is the manufacturer, which is you. This is the piece of work that makes it easy.
We compare the monitoring tools that suit your stack and your size and write down which one we would choose and why. We set that tool up in an account you own and pay for, against your own component list, and route the alerts to the people in your company who would actually act on one. We give you a one-off picture of what is vulnerable in your product today, so you know what you are starting from, and one page saying what to do when an alert arrives: who is told, what they check, what the first message says, who sends it, what goes in the log. Then a short recorded walkthrough for your team, the keys, and we step back.
You own the tool and the account from that moment, and from then on you watch your own product on something that keeps working whether or not you ever hear from us again. That is the main reason to do it this way round.
What it is not. We do not watch your product. We are not sent your alerts, we owe you no response time, we run no rota and nobody here is on call, at any hour of any day. We are not a security operations centre and not an incident response service. The tool's own subscription is yours and is not included in our fee. We hold your credentials only while we are setting the tool up and give them back at hand-over. The public sources any tool reads are other people's and can be late or incomplete. You decide whether a weakness is really being exploited, you decide what to report, and you send it. A vulnerability is actively exploited when there is reliable evidence that a malicious actor has exploited it in a system without the system owner's permission. Nothing has to run for that to be true: an authentication bypass, reaching another customer's data, or the use of stolen credentials where a weakness in the product let the attacker obtain or use them, all count, so the 24-hour clock can already be running where no malicious code was involved.[Art. 3(42)] That test is easier to meet than most teams assume, and an attack on the product itself is a second, separate test. An incident that has an impact on the security of the product counts as severe, and so has to be reported, if either of two things is true: it harms, or is capable of harming, the product's ability to protect the availability, authenticity, integrity or confidentiality of sensitive or important data or functions; or it has led, or is capable of leading, to malicious code being introduced or run in the product or in a user's own systems. Either limb on its own is enough, and "capable of" is enough — the duty does not wait for harm that has already happened. This test is for severe incidents only; it never applies to the vulnerability side.[Art. 14(5)]
If we recommend a particular tool, we take nothing from the company behind it. No referral fee, no commission, no partner status. We put that in writing at the same moment, and the choice is recorded in your decision log as a decision you took on our advice. What we suggest is what fits your product and your team, and there is no other reason for it to be on the list.
It is one fee, once, per unit, and the second and later units cost less, because by then it is the same tool and the same routes with a different component list. What you pay for it comes off Market Ready in full, at what you paid, the same as everything else on our list, and that credit does not expire.
Train your team
Half-day training, in-house, up to 8 people
€1,500per session
Half a day, in your own building or online, for a group of up to eight rather than a seat: what the law asks of engineers, how the component list and the build checks work, and how the plan runs when something happens. It ends in a short practice run.
One price for the group, not a price a head, up to that ceiling. What you pay for it comes off Market Ready in full too, and that credit does not expire.
The package we are not selling yet
It is called Market Ready, and it is the bigger job, for the date when the rest of the law lands. The main obligations of the Cyber Resilience Act (essential requirements, technical documentation, conformity assessment, CE marking, importer and distributor duties) apply from 11 December 2027.[Art. 71(2)] Every essential requirement checked against your product and closed or planned; how you build and how you ship updates written down and running; the risk assessment done; the technical file assembled in the structure the law asks for; and the declaration drafted for you to complete and sign. The manufacturer draws up the technical documentation with the content set out in Annex VII before placing the product on the market and keeps it up to date during the support period.[Art. 31; Annex VII]
It is not on our price list at the moment, and that is deliberate. The deadline and the duties are settled law and none of that is in doubt. What has not been published is the European standard you would measure the work against. As at 10 September 2026, no harmonised standard for the Cyber Resilience Act had had its reference published in the Official Journal, so the presumption of conformity that comes with a harmonised standard was not available and our controls are versioned against the drafts. This is a point-in-time check: it must be re-read and re-dated before it is quoted anywhere, because the day a reference is published the sentence stops being true.[Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 Art. 27(1) — the presumption attaches on publication of the reference in the Official Journal by the Commission, not on adoption by CEN-CENELEC, so the page in source_url cannot evidence an absence from the Official Journal and is the wrong source for this row. The value is the date we last checked, not a figure from the provision.] For some products the missing standard changes the route entirely rather than only the paperwork. Conformity assessment uses the modules in Annex VIII. A default product may use internal control (module A), or, if the manufacturer prefers, EU-type examination with production control (modules B and C), full quality assurance (module H), or a European cybersecurity certification scheme where one is available and applicable. An important class I product must go to a notified body under modules B and C or under module H whenever the manufacturer has not applied, or has applied only in part, harmonised standards, common specifications or a European cybersecurity certification scheme at assurance level at least substantial — and also where no such standard, specification or scheme exists at all. An important class II product must use modules B and C, module H, or such a certification scheme; there is no internal-control route for it.[Art. 32(1), 32(2), 32(3); Annex VIII] As at 10 September 2026 no harmonised standard had been published for the Cyber Resilience Act, so a class I manufacturer could not reach the internal-control route by that road. That is a point-in-time check and not a permanent state: the day a reference is published, the sentence stops being true. Whether a common specification or a European cybersecurity certification scheme at assurance level at least substantial covers a given category is a separate question we have not established, so check those two before concluding that a notified body is unavoidable.[Art. 32(2)] So we will not charge you for a technical file built against a draft that can still move, and then charge you again to redo it. We would rather take it off the list than sell you something we are not confident in yet.
It goes back on the list when those references are published. We are not giving you a date for that, because publishing them is not our work and not our timetable. We are still glad to talk it through, plan it with you and tell you what it will involve.
What that means for your money. Everything you have already paid us comes off it in full — not a percentage and not a voucher. That credit never expires: there is no window and nothing you have to do to keep it. And we hold today's price for you: we write to you when it goes back on sale, and for the period Article 9.7 sets — a number written into your agreement, not into this page — it costs you the held figure less everything you have already paid. If it never goes back on sale, the credit goes against anything else we sell instead. All of that is Article 9.7 of the agreement you sign, not just a sentence on a page — including the limits: it is a credit against our own work rather than cash, and it is not refunded. The figures are on the pricing page.
Get ready to report first. It is on sale today, the reporting duty is what it answers, and every euro of it comes off this.
What we do not do
This is the part of the page we would want to read first, so it is not in the small print. Knowing where we stop is what lets the price be a fixed number, and it is how you can tell what you still have to arrange somewhere else.
Unless the contract says otherwise, we do not do and are not responsible for:
- breaking into your systems to test them, certifying anything, or attesting that a product is secure;
- changing your product, your firmware, your infrastructure or your suppliers, or fixing what the scanners find (we add build configuration and policy files; your engineers review and merge them);
- monitoring your product, receiving your alerts, triaging them, answering within any period, or being on call — at any hour, on any day, on any package;
- sending anything to an authority, in any circumstances, or speaking for you in front of one;
- legal advice, or deciding what your legal obligations are;
- hardware, radio, safety or any other regulatory regime;
- the subscription to any tool we help you choose or set up;
- any promise that a product is free of weaknesses, or that every weakness, attack or incident will be found;
- the duties of your importers, distributors or customers;
- work on products, versions or components the contract does not name.
None of that is us being careful with you. Every one of those lines is somebody else's job, and telling you which ones early is more use than finding out late.
We use scanners and AI-assisted tools for parts of the work. Whether the law covers you, which group your product is in, how serious a finding is and which deadline applies are worked out by published rules, never by a model. Every document is released by a named engineer, and your code is never used to train or test a model. The detail is on the how we use AI page.
How it runs
The free check
Two minutes on this site, no account and no call. Most people know after it whether they need us at all.
One form, in your own time
About half an hour, saved as you go. It asks what the product is, what is in it and how it is built — the questions we would otherwise spend a morning asking you.
Read-only access to one repository
A link and a token, ten minutes of an engineer's day. Nothing leaves the EU.
The proposal and the contract
A statement of work listing products, deliverables and fees, signed electronically.
The work, on a tracker you can see
What is done, what is next, what we need from you and by when. Written updates, not meetings.
Approvals in writing
Everything we hand over gets a page with a plain summary, the file itself, and a button to accept it or to tell us it is wrong. You have ten business days and you can use them at nine in the evening.
The practice run, on your own afternoon
We send the exercise and the script; your team runs it when it suits them and sends us the notes; we read them and write back what to change.
Hand-over, and it ends
A short recorded walkthrough you can watch when it suits you, the folder with everything in it, and — if you took the monitoring set-up — the keys to your own tool account. The statement of work finishes there. Nothing carries on afterwards and nothing renews by itself.
Written questions get an answer within one working day, and we will not make the work depend on a call. There is no service desk behind this: nobody here is on call, and we would rather say so than promise a phone that is always answered.
Every package is a one-off fee. Larger ones are invoiced half on signature and half on delivery, smaller ones once in full, with the threshold written into your statement of work. Every decision you take on our advice goes into a log that becomes part of your evidence.
The fix-it warranty
If a deliverable does not match the statement of work, tell us in writing inside the ten-business-day acceptance period: we correct it and deliver it again at no charge, and the corrected version gets a fresh acceptance period. For twelve months after delivery we extend the same free correction and re-delivery to a deliverable that falls short of the reasonable skill and care we owe — including one your own customer or a distributor turns down for a reason inside the agreed scope. That is Article 7.4 of the services agreement you sign.
We give no warranty about the position a market surveillance authority — or any other authority, including the national team your reports go to and an approved outside body — may take on scope, classification, conformity, or on a report you filed: nobody can, and Article 13.4 of the same agreement says so. The warranty does not cover reasons outside the agreed scope, changes in the law or the standards after delivery, or decisions you took against our advice. Where a correction would need access to a tool account we have already handed back to you, we tell you what to change and you make the change.
Talk to an engineer
The free check answers whether the law reaches your product. Write to us for what it takes from there, and which package fits — or that none does. We answer within one working day.